2002 WA Tables & Graphs

Areawide II - 2002 Apple/Pear Annual Report Table and Graphs

Table 1. Areawide II growers, acreage & varieties

APPLES
Orchard	Region	Main Cultivar	Acres
A1	West Richland	Gala	18
A2	Vantage	Early Fuji	28
A3	Mattawa	Spur Red	30
A4	Wapato	Granny Smith	40
A5	Moxee	Spur Red	40
A6	West Yakima	Spur Red/Jonagold/ others	17
A7	Quincy	Gala	16
A8	Quincy	Red Delicious	25
A9	Quincy	Golden Delicious	28
A10	Chelan	Red Delicious	30
A11	Orondo	Fuji	20
A12	Orondo	Golden	20
A13	Brewster	Granny Smith	40
A14	Brewster	Fuji	25
A15	Bridgeport	Granny Smith	25
PEARS
Orchard	Region	Main Cultivar	Acres
P1	Moxee	Bosc/Anjou	15
P2	Moxee	Red Anjou	20
P3	Naches	Bartlett	16
P4	Monitor	Bosc	17
P5	Dryden	Anjou	20
P6	Entiat	Anjou	16

Table 2. Average capture of CM during the first and second-generation flight periods
in pheromone and kairomone lure-baited traps at 15 apple AWII sites, 2002.

Grower	Average capture in BB lure baited traps				Average capture in DA lure baited traps
	First generation		Second generation		First generation		Second generation
	OP	NON OP	OP	NON OP	OP	NON OP	OP	NON OP
1	2.5	0.5	1.0	0.8	0.3	0.0	2.8	1.0
2	1.7	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.5	1.8	0.2	0.4
3	10.5	9.5	2.0	3.8	17.3	12.7	7.0	7.2
4	1.0	2.5	4.1	1.8	3.5	0.9	2.6	0.8
5	1.8	3.4	0.5	3.0	1.9	0.8	2.1	3.8
6	1.8	0.5	0.0	1.0	0.3	0.3	0.3	0.0
7	0.0	1.0	0.0	0.3	0.3	0.5	0.8	0.3
8	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.3	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.0
9	0.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.2
10	0.8	0.5	0.3	0.3	0.0	0.3	0.3	0.3
11	0.0	0.3	0.3	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.5	0.3
12	1.8	0.8	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.5	0.0
13	0.1	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.5	0.1
14	0.0	1.0	0.0	0.0	0.2	0.2	0.2	0.0
15	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
mean	1.5	1.3	0.6	0.8	1.7	1.2	1.2	1.0
SEM	0.68	0.64	0.29	0.30	1.14	0.83	0.48	0.51

Table 3. Average CM per trap in pheromone
(BB) and DA traps for all blocks in 2001
and 2002

		ave moths/trap/season
		BB		DA
Year	Generation	mean	SEM	mean	SEM
2001	1st gen	5.6	2.15	2.9	1.15
	2nd gen	1.6	0.45	2.3	0.85
	Total	7.2	2.33	5.2	1.66
2002	1st gen	1.4	0.46	1.4	0.70
	2nd gen	0.7	0.21	1.1	0.34
	Total	2.1	0.61	2.5	1.01

Table 4. Average capture of leafroller moths in standard load-baited pheromone traps at AWII sites in the first and
second generation, 2002.

GROWER	Seasonal capture of OBLR moths - standard load lures				Seasonal capture of PLR moths - standard load lures
	First generation		Second generation		First generation		Second generation
	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP
1	43	27	168	202	6	9	56	42
2	5	3	27	13	0	0	0	0
3	443	499	404	442	0	0	0	0
4	6	3	15	8	210	206	210	244
5	0	1	24	1	111	165	85	149
6	0	0	6	0	234	113	217	183
7	98	106	81	61	4	2	43	55
8	204	160	87	70	148	189	99	86
9	90	176	80	62	6	5	66	33
10	28	12	9	3	6	1	15	12
11	51	72	161	286	150	104	245	231
12	11	14	31	48	130	107	448	459
13	31	1	182	47	0	0	1	0
14	180	35	347	122	0	0	2	0
15	41	23	30	24	23	5	13	13
mean	82	75	110	93	69	60	100	100
SEM	30.5	33.8	31.8	32.5	22.1	20.2	33.0	33.9

Table 5. Average capture of leafroller moths in low load-baited pheromone traps at AWII sites in the
first and second generation, 2002.

GROWER	Total OBLR moths/season low-load lures				Total PLR moths/season low-load lures
	First generation		Second generation		First generation		Second generation
	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP
1	18	5	45	37	2	2	1	2
2	0	1	6	1	0	0	0	0
3	20	13	151	80	0	0	0	0
4	2	0	11	4	36	102	54	32
5	0	0	5	0	38	51	61	67
6	0	0	2	0	54	33	114	59
7	28	44	48	44	2	3	20	24
8	35	36	51	42	62	73	60	47
9	14	74	22	28	3	2	39	16
10	7	5	1	4	0	0	7	4
11	44	66	42	144	55	42	76	76
12	1	8	1	4	83	97	251	327
13	6	0	60	0	0	0	0	0
14	50	3	196	51	0	0	0	0
15	22	5	15	4	4	0	0	0
mean	16	17	44	30	23	27	46	44
SEM	4.3	6.5	14.8	10.4	7.5	9.7	17.3	21.4

Table 6. Leafroller catches in standard and low-load lure-baited pheromone traps
for first and second generations, 2001 and 2002

		OBLR -Std.lure		PLR -Std.lure		OBLR -Lowload		PLR -Lowload
		avg.	SEM	avg.	SEM	avg.	SEM	avg.	SEM
2001	1st gen	56	18.8	40	13.6	5	2.1	8	3.6
	2nd gen	135	29.7	36	13.1	29	13.7	3	0.8
	TOTAL	191	45.9	75	25.1	34	15.5	12	4.0
2002	1st gen	79	22.4	64	14.7	17	3.8	25	6.0
	2nd gen	101	22.4	100	23.2	37	9.0	45	13.5
	TOTAL	180	42.2	162	34.4	54	11.6	69	18.5

Table 7. Average capture of leafroller moths in AA-baited traps at AWII sites in the
first and second generations, 2002.

Grower	Average LR moths/AA traps - 2002				Average LR moths/AA traps - 2001
	First generation		Second generation		First generation		Second generation
	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP
1	0.5	0.3	0.3	0.5	0	0	0.8	0.5
2	0.2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
3	3.7	4.7	5.7	2.5	3.3	2.5	14.5	18
4	0.4	2.6	4.8	2.6	2.4	3.4	8.3	2
5	0.3	0	0.6	1.9	1.1	1.4	12.8	6
6	0	0	1.3	0	2.5	0.8	4.3	1
7	0.5	0.8	0	0.3	0.8	0.3	2	2.5
8	3.3	4.8	0.3	0	5.3	2.5	5	5
9	0.2	0.4	0	0	0.3	0.3	1.3	0.8
10	0	0	0	0.3	0	0.5	0	0
11	0.3	0	0.5	0.9	0.8	0.5	3	0.8
12	0.5	0.5	0.3	0	1.8	0.3	1.3	1.5
13	0	0	0.1	0.1	0	0	0	0.3
14	0.2	0.2	3.6	0.2	3.8	1.8	1	0
15	0	0	0	0	0	0.2	0.5	0
mean	0.7	1	1.2	0.6	1.5	1	3.7	2.6
SEM	0.3	0.43	0.49	0.24	0.43	0.28	1.2	1.2

Table 8. Total lacanobia moths in pheromone lure-baited traps in AWII sites in the first and
second flight periods, 2001 and 2002.

Grower	Total Lacanobia in pheromone traps - 2002				Total Lacanobia in pheromone traps - 2001
	First generation		Second generation		First generation		Second generation
	OP	NON- OP	OP	NON- OP	OP	NON- OP	OP	NON- OP
1	151	29	177	146	75	119	82	26
2	197	191	157	154	192	141	269	134
3	393	309	124	65	321	384	477	631
4	342	322	387	328	478	425	622	512
5	18	669	33	490	549	529	692	716
6	251	228	166	313	158	227	198	241
7	170	432	383	453	576	1538	397	980
8	162	211	413	334	235	677	398	610
9	276	392	412	396	1389	1005	997	691
10	429	416	140	193	510	608	118	197
11	1008	1315	1295	1179	1420	2128	884	1223
12	385	787	276	730	473	1055	257	555
13	81	289	337	485	9	196	0	103
14	148	203	112	52	417	185	78	68
15	257	197	475	213	519	343	263	80
mean	285	399	326	369	488	637	382	451
SEM	60.0	82.1	77.7	74.7	106.6	148.6	77.7	94.4

Table 9. The average percent damaged shoots or fruit in AWII orchards at different times
during the 2002 season

	Average percent damaged shoots (LR or LAC) or fruit (CM)
	late May Leafroller		early July CM		early July Lacanobia		early Aug Leafroller		late Aug/ Sept CM
Grower	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP	OP	NONOP
1	0.60	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.40	0.60	0.00	0.00	0.30	0.00
2	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
3	1.80	0.20	0.00	0.30		0.00	0.20	0.60	0.00	0.00
4	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.20	0.50	0.30	0.00	0.00	0.40	0.80
5	0.00	0.00	0.40	0.10	1.60	1.60	0.00	0.00	0.50	0.40
6	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.20	0.00	0.20	0.40	0.00
7	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.00	4.00		0.00
8	0.00	0.40	0.00	0.00	0.60	1.00	2.20	2.80	0.00	0.00
9	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.40	0.20	0.20	1.40	0.00	0.00
10	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.60	1.40	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
11	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	2.80	2.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
12	0.00	0.40	0.00	0.00	2.00	0.40	0.00	0.40	0.10	0.00
13	0.00	0.00	0.10	0.00	3.20	1.20	1.80	0.60	0.00	0.00
14	1.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.00	0.80	3.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
15	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.60	0.40	0.60	0.00	0.00	0.00
mean	0.23	0.07	0.03	0.04	1.12	0.72	0.60	0.67	0.12	0.08
SEM	0.14	0.04	0.03	0.02	0.27	0.16	0.25	0.31	0.05	0.06

Table 10. Average percent fruit and shoot damage in AWII orchards from in-season
orchard surveys, 2001 and 2002

Year	Average percent shoot or fruit injury from 15 apple blocks
	Late May Leafroller		Early July CM		Early July LAC		Early August Leafroller		Late Aug/Sept CM
	OP	NON OP	OP	NON OP	OP	NON OP	OP	NON OP	OP	NON OP
2001	0.20	0.29	0.02	0.03	1.35	1.31	0.40	0.17	0.22	0.24
2002	0.23	0.07	0.03	0.04	1.12	0.72	0.60	0.67	0.11	0.08

Table 11. Average percent fruit damage detected in bin samples
from AWII orchards, 2002

	CODLING MOTH		LEAFROLLER		CUTWORM
Grower	OP	NON OP	OP	NON OP	OP	NON OP
1	0.20	0.00	0.16	0.00	0.00	0.00
2	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
3	0.32	0.48	0.36	0.08	0.00	0.00
4	0.12	0.24	0.04	0.00	0.44	0.08
5	0.44	0.36	0.00	0.00	0.04	0.00
6	0.00	0.00	0.08	0.12	0.00	0.16
7	0.04	0.04	0.08	0.28	0.00	0.04
8	0.00	0.00	0.32	0.44	0.00	0.00
9	0.00	0.00	0.32	0.08	0.00	0.00
10	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.20
11	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
12	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.16	0.08	0.20
13	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
14	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
15	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
mean	0.07	0.07	0.09	0.08	0.04	0.05
SEM	0.04	0.04	0.03	0.03	0.03	0.02

Table 12. Average percent fruit damage by lepidopteran
pests from bin samples during harvest in AWII orchards,
2001 and 2002.

	Codling moth		Leafroller		Lacanobia
Treatment	2001	2002	2001	2002	2001	2002
OP	0.11	0.07	0.28	0.09	0.07	0.04
NON-OP	0.05	0.07	0.09	0.08	0.05	0.05

Table 13. Foliar pesticide sprays for control of lepidoteran andother pests.
(one spray=one material *one date* 100 of block treated).

Grower	Codling Moth		Leafroller		CM+LR		Other		Total		Cost
Grower	OP	NON OP	OP	NON OP	OP	NON OP	OP	NON OP	OP	NON OP	OP	NON OP
1	4	3	1	0	0	1	8	10	13	14	$271	$311
2	2	1	1.5	1.3	0	0	4.5	4.7	8	7	$293	$230
3	3.5	2.8	2.4	0.7	0	0	5.9	5.8	11.8	9.3	$324	$271
4	1.3	1.4	1.5	0.5	0	0	5.6	5.6	8.4	7.5	$303	$304
5	3	3	2	2	0	0	4	4	9	9	$144	$178
6	2	1	2	1	0	0	4.8	8.4	8.8	10.4	$155	$176
7	2	2	2	2	0	0	8.6	8.6	12.6	12.6	$280	$292
8	1	1	2	1	0	0	4	1	7	3	$148	$109
9	2	1	1	0	0	0	9.8	7.3	12.8	8.3	$331	$222
10	1	1	1	0	0	0	2	3	4	4	$105	$91
11	1	1	2	1	0	0	3	4	6	6	$150	$135
12	2	2	2	1	0	0	5	7	9	10	$256	$234
13	1	1	1	1	0	0	1	0	3	2	$96	$81
14	1	1	2	1	0	0	2	2	5	4	$147	$123
15	1.1	1	1	1	0	0	2	1	4.1	3	$114	$82
Mean	1.9	1.5	1.6	0.9	0	0.1	4.7	4.8	8.2	7.3	$208	$189
SEM	0.25	0.21	0.13	0.16	0	0.07	0.67	0.79	0.86	0.94	$22	$21

Table 14. Average number of foliar pesticide applications and costs for AWII apple orchards,
2001 and 2002.

	Codling Moth		Leafroller		CM+LR		Other		Total		Cost
	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP	OP	NON-OP
2001	2.3	2.3	1.4	0.9	0	0.5	5.7	6.2	9.3	9.9	$219	$250
2002	1.9	1.5	1.6	0.9	0	0.1	4.7	4.8	8.2	7.3	$208	$189

Table 15. Counts of key pear pests in Areawide II pear blocks, 2002

		Psylla adults	Psylla nymphs	Twospotted mites	Grape mealybug
Grower	Treatment	Number/tray (May-Aug avg)	Number/shoot leaf (Jun-Aug avg)	Number/lower leaf (Aug avg)	number per minute(Aug timed search)
P1	CONV	0.09	0.03	0.21	No sample
P1	SOFT	0.11	0.13	0.21	No sample
P2	CONV	0.12	0.04	0.13	No sample
P2	SOFT	0.11	0.05	0.72	No sample
P3	CONV	0.21	0.07	0.03	No sample
P3	SOFT	0.16	0.09	0	No sample
P4	CONV	0.37	0.18	0	0.52
P4	SOFT	0.3	0.18	0	0.53
P5	CONV	0.8	0.08	0	0.23
P5	SOFT	0.12	0.02	0	0.17
P6	CONV	1.36	0.22	0.07	0.52
P6	SOFT	0.06	0.03	0.31	0.2

Table 16. Codling moth catches in BB and DA-lure baited traps, 2001 & 2002

Grower	Average capture in BB traps				Average capture in DA traps
Grower	2002-1st gen	2001-1st gen	2002-2nd gen	2001-2nd gen	2002 1st gen	2001 1st gen	2002 2nd gen	2001 2nd gen
P1	1	0.3	1	1.3	0.6	0.8	0.1	0.5
P2	0.6	0.5	0.1	0	0	0.5	0	0.3
P3	3.6	3.8	15.3	3.3	0.8	2	0.6	0.5
P4	2.8	3.3	8.1	10.8	0.5	0.3	1.5	1.5
P5	4		2.1		0.1		0.1
P6	10.3	1.8	0.3	5.3	1	0.5	0	0.5

Table 17. Catches of OBLR and PLR moth in low-load pheromone traps, 2001 and 2002

Grower	OBLR - average capture in low-load pheromone traps				PLR - average capture in low-load pheromone traps
Grower	2002 1st gen	2001 1st gen	2002 2nd gen	2001 2nd gen	2002 1st gen	2001 1st gen	2002 2nd gen	2001 2nd gen
P1	0	0	32	0	91	14	269	132
P2	1	1	10	0	65	3	89	26
P3	0	0	5	0	92	21	352	44
P4	40	25	172	26	122	22	380	55
P5	3		0		31		35
P6	53	77	7	5	10	14	26	3

Table 18. Average number of natural enemies from beating tray samples, AWII pear orchards, 2002

		Average per tray (Jun-Aug)					Total of 10
Grower	Treatment	Deraeocoris	Campylomma	Lacewings	Trechnites	Spiders	NE classes
P1	CONV	0	0.03	0.02	0	0.06	0.11
P1	SOFT	0	0.01	0.05	0.01	0.06	0.13
P2	CONV	0	0.01	0.03	0	0.03	0.07
P2	SOFT	0	0	0	0	0.02	0.02
P3	CONV	0	0.07	0	0	0.03	0.12
P3	SOFT	0	0.02	0.01	0	0.01	0.07
P4	CONV	0.01	0	0.01	0	0.02	0.07
P4	SOFT	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.09	0.03	0.18
P5	CONV	0.01	0.01	0.02	0.04	0.02	0.15
P5	SOFT	0	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.03	0.16
P6	CONV	0.01	0	0.01	0.07	0.07	0.28
P6	SOFT	0.05	0	0.04	0.01	0.15	0.54

Table 19. Average percent injury to fruit at harvest, AWII blocks, 2002

Grower	Treatment	Psylla	GMB	CM	LR	Fruitworm Cutworm	Box Elder Stink bug	Lygus	SJS	PRM
P1	CONV	0.32	0.00	0.20	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.28
P1	SOFT	0.16	0.00	0.08	0.08	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.16
P2	CONV	0.16	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.20	0.00	0.00
P2	SOFT	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.16	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
P3	CONV	0.28	0.00	0.00	0.20	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.16
P3	SOFT	1.92	0.00	0.24	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	9.08
P4	CONV	0.08	18.44	0.68	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
P4	SOFT	0.04	33.24	0.08	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
P5	CONV	0.28	1.80	0.00	0.04	0.00	0.04	0.00	0.00	0.00
P5	SOFT	0.00	2.20	0.04	0.00	0.00	0.12	0.00	0.00	0.00
P6	CONV	0.24	1.52	0.12	0.16	0.16	0.00	0.00	0.04	0.00
P6	SOFT	0.04	0.64	0.00	0.04	0.08	0.00	0.04	0.00	0.00

AVERAGES	CONV	0.23	3.63	0.17	0.07	0.03	0.01	0.03	0.01	0.07
AVERAGES	SOFT	0.36	6.01	0.07	0.05	0.01	0.02	0.01	0.00	1.54

Table 20. Foliar pesticide applications, AWII pear orchards, 2002

				Number of applications
Orchard	Treat- ment	# apps*	$/ac	Agri- Mek	OP	Esteem	Pyra- mite	Sur- round	Oil	Provado/ Actara/ Assail	Ecozin	Dis- ruptors
P1	CONV	11	$182			1	1	0	5	1		2
P1	SOFT	12	$183			2	0	2	4	0		0
P2	CONV	13.5	$423	1	1.5	0		0	5	1		3.5
P2	SOFT	16	$432	0	0	2		2	5	0		0
P3	CONV	10	$147	1	3	0		0	4	1		5
P3	SOFT	12	$273	0	0	2		2	3	0		0
P4	CONV	14	$351		1	2		2	5		2	1
P4	SOFT	14	$362		0	2		2	5		2	0
P5	CONV	19	$579			0	1	3	7	1	1	2
P5	SOFT	19	$491			2	0	2	7	0	3	0
P6	CONV	17	$329		1	1		3	7	1		2
P6	SOFT	20	$387		0	2		3	8	0		0
Average	CONV	14.1	$335	0.3	1.1	0.7	0.3	1.3	5.5	0.8	0.5	2.6
Average	SOFT	15.5	$355	0	0	2	0	2.2	5.3	0	0.8	0
		*1 material x 1 date x 100 coverage = 1 application

Updated January 21, 2003

Page created by Emily Bautista & Jerry Tangren

Contact us: tangren@wsu.edu 509-663-8181| Accessibility | Copyright | Policies
Tree Fruit Research & Extension Center, Washington State University,1100 N Western Ave., Wenatchee, WA, 98801 USA